NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs Intel Arc A350M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q and 4GB VRAM Arc A350M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 4% (1200MHz vs 1150MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 112.0GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
Intel Arc A350M 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 11 months late
Lower TDP (25W vs 50W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
+39%
2.458 TFLOPS
Arc A350M
1.766 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
+14%
3150
Arc A350M
2749
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
+6%
1429
Arc A350M
1336
Blender
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
+48%
581
Arc A350M
392
Graphics Card
Apr 2020
Release Date
Mar 2022
GeForce 16 Mobile
Generation
Alchemist
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
1035 MHz
Base Clock
300 MHz
1200 MHz
Boost Clock
1150 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
112.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
16
SM Count
-
1024
Shading Units
768
64
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
6
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
38.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
27.60 GPixel/s
76.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
55.20 GTexel/s
4.915 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
3.533 TFLOPS
2.458 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.766 TFLOPS
76.80 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
441.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
25W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
DG2-128
N18P-G62
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Turing
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
6 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.6
