Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs AMD FirePro M6000

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs AMD FirePro M6000

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q and 2GB VRAM FirePro M6000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1200MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro M6000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (43W vs 50W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q +140%
2.458 TFLOPS
FirePro M6000
1.024 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2020
Release Date
Jul 2012
GeForce 16 Mobile
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1035 MHz
Base Clock
-
1200 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
10
16
SM Count
-
1024
Shading Units
640
64
TMUs
40
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

38.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.80 GPixel/s
76.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.00 GTexel/s
4.915 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.458 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1024 GFLOPS
76.80 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
64.00 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
43W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
Heathrow
N18P-G62
GPU Variant
Heathrow XT GL (216-0835033)
Turing
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy