NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs NVIDIA GeForce 9700M GTS
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q and 512MB VRAM GeForce 9700M GTS to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1200MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
976 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 60W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
+1835%
2.458 TFLOPS
GeForce 9700M GTS
0.127 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2020
Release Date
Jul 2008
GeForce 16 Mobile
Generation
GeForce 9M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1035 MHz
Base Clock
-
1200 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
16
SM Count
6
1024
Shading Units
48
64
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
38.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.480 GPixel/s
76.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.72 GTexel/s
4.915 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.458 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
127.2 GFLOPS
76.80 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
50W
TDP
60W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
G94
N18P-G62
GPU Variant
NB9E-GS
Turing
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
65 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
0.505 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
240 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
