CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 220M
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 220M
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
NVIDIA GeForce GT 220M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q and 512MB VRAM GeForce GT 220M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1200MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
992 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 220M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (14W vs 50W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
+2972%
2.458 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 220M
0.08 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
VS
GeForce GT 220M
Graphics Card
Apr 2020
Release Date
Jun 2009
GeForce 16 Mobile
Generation
GeForce 200M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-II
Clock Speeds
1035 MHz
Base Clock
-
1200 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s
Render Config
16
SM Count
4
-
Compute Units
-
1024
Shading Units
32
64
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
Theoretical Performance
38.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.000 GPixel/s
76.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
8.000 GTexel/s
4.915 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.458 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
76.80 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
G96C
N18P-G62
GPU Variant
N10P-GV2
Turing
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
55 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
0.314 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
121 mm²
Board Design
50W
TDP
14W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA RTX A1000 Embedded vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs NVIDIA GeForce 930A
3
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3670
5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile
6
Intel Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56
8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A
9
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs AMD Radeon R7 M380
10
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs AMD Radeon R5 M240
Related News
1
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
2
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
3
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
4
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
5
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
6
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
7
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
8
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
9
Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports
10
Does the Apple A18 Neural Engine Boast Superior Performance? Computational Power May Surpass M4 Chip
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy