Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 425M

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 425M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 425M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1200MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
928 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 425M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (23W vs 50W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q +1043%
2.458 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 425M
0.215 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2020
Release Date
Sep 2010
GeForce 16 Mobile
Generation
GeForce 400M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1035 MHz
Base Clock
-
1200 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
16
SM Count
2
1024
Shading Units
96
64
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

38.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.240 GPixel/s
76.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
8.960 GTexel/s
4.915 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.458 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
215.0 GFLOPS
76.80 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
17.92 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
23W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
GF108
N18P-G62
GPU Variant
N11P-GS-A1
Turing
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
0.585 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
116 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
2.1
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy