Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 285M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1200MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q +540%
2.458 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 285M
0.384 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2020
Release Date
Feb 2010
GeForce 16 Mobile
Generation
GeForce 200M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1035 MHz
Base Clock
-
1200 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

16
SM Count
16
-
Compute Units
-
1024
Shading Units
128
64
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB

Theoretical Performance

38.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.600 GPixel/s
76.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.40 GTexel/s
4.915 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.458 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
384.0 GFLOPS
76.80 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
G92
N18P-G62
GPU Variant
N10E-GTX1-B1
Turing
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
65 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²

Board Design

50W
TDP
75W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy