NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 285M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1200MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
+540%
2.458 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 285M
0.384 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2020
Release Date
Feb 2010
GeForce 16 Mobile
Generation
GeForce 200M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1035 MHz
Base Clock
-
1200 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
16
SM Count
16
1024
Shading Units
128
64
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
38.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.600 GPixel/s
76.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.40 GTexel/s
4.915 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.458 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
384.0 GFLOPS
76.80 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
50W
TDP
75W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
G92
N18P-G62
GPU Variant
N10E-GTX1-B1
Turing
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
65 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
