CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 285M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1200MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
+540%
2.458 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 285M
0.384 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
VS
GeForce GTX 285M
Graphics Card
Apr 2020
Release Date
Feb 2010
GeForce 16 Mobile
Generation
GeForce 200M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1035 MHz
Base Clock
-
1200 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
16
SM Count
16
-
Compute Units
-
1024
Shading Units
128
64
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
Theoretical Performance
38.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.600 GPixel/s
76.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.40 GTexel/s
4.915 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.458 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
384.0 GFLOPS
76.80 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
G92
N18P-G62
GPU Variant
N10E-GTX1-B1
Turing
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
65 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²
Board Design
50W
TDP
75W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA RTX A1000 Embedded vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs NVIDIA GeForce 930A
3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3670
4
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
5
Intel Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile
7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56
8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
9
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs AMD Radeon HD 7510M
10
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4530
Related News
1
The P-Cores and E-Cores in Arrow Lake Will Be Interleaved, Reducing Core Communication Latency and Improving Heat Dissipation
2
Changes in Intel Arrow Lake P/E Core Layout: Two Major Benefits
3
Time to Step Up, AMD and Intel! Nvidia Faces Antitrust Lawsuits in France, US, and EU
4
Intel Arrow Lake-S Features Dual Direct M.2 Slots: One PCIe 5.0 x4 and One PCIe 4.0 x4
5
AMD Ryzen 9000X3D Series to Feature Fully Unlocked Overclocking; DDR5-6400: The 'Sweet Spot' for Zen 5 Memory Speeds
6
Intel Z890 Motherboard Specs Leaked: Farewell to DDR4 Memory
7
AMD Ryzen 9000 Series Now Available for Pre-order in Europe: 9950X Priced at €660, Shipping by August 2
8
AMD's Latest Breakthrough Technology Could Change the Game in the Future
9
Researchers Utilize NVIDIA Omniverse Platform to Analyze and Improve 3D Stacked Chip Designs
10
TSMC to Receive Over 60 EUV Lithography Machines Over the Next Two Years, Investing More Than $12.3 Billion
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy