NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs ATI Mobility FireGL V5700
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q and 512MB VRAM Mobility FireGL V5700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1200MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
904 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
+1606%
2.458 TFLOPS
Mobility FireGL V5700
0.144 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2020
Release Date
Jan 2008
GeForce 16 Mobile
Generation
Mobility FireGL
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1035 MHz
Base Clock
-
1200 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
3
16
SM Count
-
1024
Shading Units
120
64
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
38.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
76.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.800 GTexel/s
4.915 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.458 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
144.0 GFLOPS
76.80 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
50W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
M86
N18P-G62
GPU Variant
M86-M GL
(216-0683008)
Turing
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
55 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
0.378 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
135 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
4.1
