CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4570
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4570
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4570
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q and 512MB VRAM Mobility Radeon HD 4570 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1200MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
944 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
+2175%
2.458 TFLOPS
Mobility Radeon HD 4570
0.108 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
VS
Mobility Radeon HD 4570
Graphics Card
Apr 2020
Release Date
Jan 2009
GeForce 16 Mobile
Generation
M9x
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-II
Clock Speeds
1035 MHz
Base Clock
-
1200 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s
Render Config
16
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
1
1024
Shading Units
80
64
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
Theoretical Performance
38.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.720 GPixel/s
76.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
5.440 GTexel/s
4.915 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.458 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
108.8 GFLOPS
76.80 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
M92
N18P-G62
GPU Variant
M92-M2 XT A11 (216-0728006)
Turing
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
55 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
0.242 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
73 mm²
Board Design
50W
TDP
Unknown
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
4.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA RTX A1000 Embedded vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs NVIDIA GeForce 930A
3
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3670
5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile
6
Intel Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56
8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh 4 GB
9
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs AMD FirePro W4170M
10
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
Related News
1
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
2
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
3
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
4
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
5
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
6
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
7
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
8
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
9
Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports
10
Does the Apple A18 Neural Engine Boast Superior Performance? Computational Power May Surpass M4 Chip
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy