Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs AMD Radeon R5 A320

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs AMD Radeon R5 A320

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q and 1024MB VRAM Radeon R5 A320 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 45% (1200MHz vs 825MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
704 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q +365%
2.458 TFLOPS
Radeon R5 A320
0.528 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2020
Release Date
Jan 2015
GeForce 16 Mobile
Generation
All-In-One
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1035 MHz
Base Clock
750 MHz
1200 MHz
Boost Clock
825 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
16.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
5
16
SM Count
-
1024
Shading Units
320
64
TMUs
20
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

38.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.600 GPixel/s
76.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
16.50 GTexel/s
4.915 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.458 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
528.0 GFLOPS
76.80 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

50W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
Jet
N18P-G62
GPU Variant
Jet PRO (216-0856040)
Turing
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
0.69 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
56 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1 (1.2)
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.170
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy