NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs AMD Radeon R5 A335
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q and 2GB VRAM Radeon R5 A335 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1200MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
704 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
+259%
2.458 TFLOPS
Radeon R5 A335
0.684 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2020
Release Date
Oct 2015
GeForce 16 Mobile
Generation
All-In-One
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
Clock Speeds
1035 MHz
Base Clock
-
1200 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
5
16
SM Count
-
1024
Shading Units
320
64
TMUs
20
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
38.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.560 GPixel/s
76.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
21.40 GTexel/s
4.915 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.458 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
684.8 GFLOPS
76.80 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
50W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
Exo
N18P-G62
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
0.69 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
56 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1 (1.2)
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.170
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)
