Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs AMD Radeon R9 M385X

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs AMD Radeon R9 M385X

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 M385X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 9% (1200MHz vs 1100MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q +24%
2.458 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 M385X
1.971 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2020
Release Date
May 2015
GeForce 16 Mobile
Generation
Gem System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1035 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1200 MHz
Boost Clock
1100 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
76.80GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
14
16
SM Count
-
1024
Shading Units
896
64
TMUs
56
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

38.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.60 GPixel/s
76.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
61.60 GTexel/s
4.915 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.458 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.971 TFLOPS
76.80 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
123.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
Strato
N18P-G62
GPU Variant
Strato XT
Turing
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
2.08 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
160 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.170
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy