Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs NVIDIA RTX A4000 Max-Q

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs NVIDIA RTX A4000 Max-Q

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q and 8GB VRAM RTX A4000 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 80W)
NVIDIA RTX A4000 Max-Q 's Advantages
Released 1 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 16% (1395MHz vs 1200MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (352.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
4096 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
2.458 TFLOPS
RTX A4000 Max Q +480%
14.28 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Apr 2020
Release Date
Apr 2021
GeForce 16 Mobile
Generation
Ampere-MW
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1035 MHz
Base Clock
780 MHz
1200 MHz
Boost Clock
1395 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
352.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
16
SM Count
40
1024
Shading Units
5120
64
TMUs
160
32
ROPs
80
-
Tensor Cores
160
-
RT Cores
40
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

38.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
111.6 GPixel/s
76.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
223.2 GTexel/s
4.915 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
14.28 TFLOPS
2.458 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.28 TFLOPS
76.80 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
223.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
80W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
GA104
N18P-G62
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
12 nm
Process Size
8 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
17.4 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
392 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
8.6
6.6
Shader Model
6.8
© 2025 - TopCPU.net