Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile vs AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile vs AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile and 4GB VRAM Radeon E9260 PCIe to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 24% (1485MHz vs 1200MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 112.0GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 80W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile +41%
3.041 TFLOPS
Radeon E9260 PCIe
2.15 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2020
Release Date
Sep 2016
GeForce 16 Mobile
Generation
Embedded
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1350 MHz
Base Clock
1090 MHz
1485 MHz
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
112.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
14
16
SM Count
-
1024
Shading Units
896
64
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

47.52 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.20 GPixel/s
95.04 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
57.60 GTexel/s
6.083 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
2.150 TFLOPS
3.041 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.150 TFLOPS
95.04 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
134.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
80W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

TU116
GPU Name
Baffin
N18P-G61
GPU Variant
Baffin E9260 (216-0885288)
Turing
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
12 nm
Process Size
14 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
3 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy