Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 's Advantages
Released 9 months late
Boost Clock1485MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 65W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile +119%
3.041 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile
1.385 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2020
Release Date
Jul 2019
GeForce 16 Mobile
Generation
Radeon Pro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1350 MHz
Base Clock
-
1485 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

16
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
10
1024
Shading Units
640
64
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

47.52 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.31 GPixel/s
95.04 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
34.62 GTexel/s
6.083 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
1385 GFLOPS
3.041 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1385 GFLOPS
95.04 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
86.56 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

TU116
GPU Name
Polaris 23
N18P-G61
GPU Variant
Polaris 23 XT GLM
Turing
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
12 nm
Process Size
14 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
2.2 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
103 mm²

Board Design

50W
TDP
65W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy