Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile vs AMD Radeon R9 M265X

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile vs AMD Radeon R9 M265X

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 M265X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 138% (1485MHz vs 625MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile +280%
3.041 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 M265X
0.8 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2020
Release Date
Mar 2014
GeForce 16 Mobile
Generation
Gem System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1350 MHz
Base Clock
575 MHz
1485 MHz
Boost Clock
625 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
10
16
SM Count
-
1024
Shading Units
640
64
TMUs
40
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

47.52 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.00 GPixel/s
95.04 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.00 GTexel/s
6.083 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.041 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
800.0 GFLOPS
95.04 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
50.00 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

TU116
GPU Name
Venus
N18P-G61
GPU Variant
Venus PRO (216-0846009)
Turing
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1 (1.2)
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.170
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy