Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 2

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 and 512MB VRAM GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1590MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
888 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 90W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 +12850%
2.849 TFLOPS
GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 2
0.022 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2020
Release Date
Dec 2007
GeForce 16
Generation
GeForce 8
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1410 MHz
Base Clock
-
1590 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

14
SM Count
1
-
Compute Units
-
896
Shading Units
8
56
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
16 KB

Theoretical Performance

50.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.268 GPixel/s
89.04 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.268 GTexel/s
5.699 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.849 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
22.40 GFLOPS
89.04 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

TU106
GPU Name
G98
TU106-125-KAB-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
65 nm
10.8 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
445 mm²
Die Size
86 mm²

Board Design

90W
TDP
25W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy