Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 and 128MB VRAM GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 's Advantages
Released 8 years late
Boost Clock1590MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 9.600GB/s)
880 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 90W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 +6231%
2.849 TFLOPS
GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3
0.045 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2020
Release Date
Jun 2012
GeForce 16
Generation
GeForce 9
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1410 MHz
Base Clock
-
1590 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
128MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
9.600GB/s

Render Config

14
SM Count
2
-
Compute Units
-
896
Shading Units
16
56
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB

Theoretical Performance

50.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.356 GPixel/s
89.04 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.712 GTexel/s
5.699 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.849 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.86 GFLOPS
89.04 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

TU106
GPU Name
GT218
TU106-125-KAB-A1
GPU Variant
GT218-670-B1
Turing
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
10.8 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
445 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²

Board Design

90W
TDP
50W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.2
6.6
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy