CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106
NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 and 128MB VRAM GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 's Advantages
Released 8 years late
Boost Clock1590MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 9.600GB/s)
880 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 90W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 TU106
+6231%
2.849 TFLOPS
GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3
0.045 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 TU106
VS
GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3
Graphics Card
Jun 2020
Release Date
Jun 2012
GeForce 16
Generation
GeForce 9
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1410 MHz
Base Clock
-
1590 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
128MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
9.600GB/s
Render Config
14
SM Count
2
-
Compute Units
-
896
Shading Units
16
56
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
Theoretical Performance
50.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.356 GPixel/s
89.04 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.712 GTexel/s
5.699 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.849 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.86 GFLOPS
89.04 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Graphics Processor
TU106
GPU Name
GT218
TU106-125-KAB-A1
GPU Variant
GT218-670-B1
Turing
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
10.8 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
445 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²
Board Design
90W
TDP
50W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.2
6.6
Shader Model
4.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080
2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 vs AMD Radeon HD 8570 OEM
3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 vs AMD Radeon R7 370
4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 620
5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 430
6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100
7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 vs ATI Radeon HD 5770 X2
8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GS
9
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 vs AMD Radeon RX 580 OEM
10
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 vs AMD Radeon Sky 500
Related News
1
Researchers Utilize NVIDIA Omniverse Platform to Analyze and Improve 3D Stacked Chip Designs
2
TSMC to Receive Over 60 EUV Lithography Machines Over the Next Two Years, Investing More Than $12.3 Billion
3
Samsung's Own 3nm Yield is Disheartening: Galaxy S25 May Introduce MediaTek for the First Time
4
AMD Ryzen 9000 DDR5 Memory Frequency Soars: Reaches 8000MHz with All Four Slots Occupied
5
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
6
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
7
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
8
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
9
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
10
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy