Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GS

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GS

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 and 384MB VRAM GeForce 8800 GS to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1590MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 384GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 38.40GB/s)
800 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (90W vs 105W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 +979%
2.849 TFLOPS
GeForce 8800 GS
0.264 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2020
Release Date
Jan 2008
GeForce 16
Generation
GeForce 8
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1410 MHz
Base Clock
-
1590 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
384MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
38.40GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
14
SM Count
12
896
Shading Units
96
56
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
12
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
48 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

50.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.600 GPixel/s
89.04 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
26.40 GTexel/s
5.699 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.849 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
264.0 GFLOPS
89.04 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

90W
TDP
105W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

TU106
GPU Name
G92
TU106-125-KAB-A1
GPU Variant
G92-150-A2
Turing
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
65 nm
10.8 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
445 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy