NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT Mac Edition

VS

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT Mac Edition

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 and 512MB VRAM GeForce 9500 GT Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 's Advantages

Released 10 years and 1 months late

Boost Clock1590MHz

Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)

864 additional rendering cores

NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT Mac Edition 's Advantages

Lower TDP (50W vs 90W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 +3065%

2.849 TFLOPS

GeForce 9500 GT Mac Edition

0.09 TFLOPS

GeForce GTX 1650 TU106

VS

GeForce 9500 GT Mac Edition

Graphics Card

Jun 2020

Release Date

May 2010

GeForce 16

Generation

GeForce 9

Desktop

Type

Desktop

PCIe 3.0 x16

Bus Interface

PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1410 MHz

Base Clock

-

1590 MHz

Boost Clock

-

1500 MHz

Memory Clock

800 MHz

Memory

4GB

Memory Size

512MB

GDDR6

Memory Type

GDDR3

128bit

Memory Bus

128bit

192.0GB/s

Bandwidth

25.60GB/s

Render Config

14

SM Count

4

-

Compute Units

-

896

Shading Units

32

56

TMUs

16

32

ROPs

8

-

Tensor Cores

-

RT Cores

-

64 KB (per SM)

L1 Cache

-

1024 KB

L2 Cache

32 KB

Theoretical Performance

50.88 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

4.400 GPixel/s

89.04 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

8.800 GTexel/s

5.699 TFLOPS

FP16 (half)

-

2.849 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

89.60 GFLOPS

89.04 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

-

Graphics Processor

TU106

GPU Name

G96C

TU106-125-KAB-A1

GPU Variant

-

Turing

Architecture

Tesla

TSMC

Foundry

TSMC

12 nm

Process Size

55 nm

10.8 billion

Transistors

0.314 billion

445 mm²

Die Size

121 mm²

Board Design

90W

TDP

50W

250 W

Suggested PSU

250 W

1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a

Outputs

2x DVI 1x S-Video

1x 6-pin

Power Connectors

None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)

DirectX

11.1 (10_0)

4.6

OpenGL

3.3

3.0

OpenCL

1.1

1.3

Vulkan

N/A

7.5

CUDA

1.1

6.6

Shader Model

4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

1

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080

2

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 430

3

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 vs AMD Radeon HD 8570 OEM

4

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 vs ATI Radeon HD 5770 X2

5

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 vs AMD Radeon R7 370

6

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100

7

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 620

8

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 vs Intel Arc A780

9

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240 OEM

10

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 vs ATI Radeon HD 4810

Related News

1

Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience

2

Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage

3

Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation

4

Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales

5

Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It

6

New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months

7

Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD

8

New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower

9

X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W

10

First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD