Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 's Advantages
Released 12 years late
Boost Clock1590MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
704 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (90W vs 182W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 +497%
2.849 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260
0.477 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2020
Release Date
Jun 2008
GeForce 16
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1410 MHz
Base Clock
-
1590 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
448bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
14
SM Count
24
896
Shading Units
192
56
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

50.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
89.04 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
36.86 GTexel/s
5.699 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.849 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
476.9 GFLOPS
89.04 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
59.62 GFLOPS

Board Design

90W
TDP
182W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

TU106
GPU Name
GT200
TU106-125-KAB-A1
GPU Variant
G200-100-A2
Turing
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
65 nm
10.8 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
445 mm²
Die Size
576 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.3
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy