Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 vs NVIDIA P106 100

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 vs NVIDIA P106 100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 and 6GB VRAM P106 100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 's Advantages
Released 3 years late
Lower TDP (90W vs 120W)
NVIDIA P106 100 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 7% (1709MHz vs 1590MHz)
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.2GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 TU106
2.849 TFLOPS
P106 100 +53%
4.375 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2020
Release Date
Jun 2017
GeForce 16
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1410 MHz
Base Clock
1506 MHz
1590 MHz
Boost Clock
1709 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
2002 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
192.2GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
14
SM Count
10
896
Shading Units
1280
56
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

50.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
82.03 GPixel/s
89.04 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
136.7 GTexel/s
5.699 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
68.36 GFLOPS
2.849 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.375 TFLOPS
89.04 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
136.7 GFLOPS

Board Design

90W
TDP
120W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

TU106
GPU Name
GP106
TU106-125-KAB-A1
GPU Variant
GP106-100-A1
Turing
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
16 nm
10.8 billion
Transistors
4.4 billion
445 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
6.1
6.6
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy