NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER

VS

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 and 12GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 's Advantages

Lower TDP (90W vs 220W)

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER 's Advantages

Released 3 years and 7 months late

Boost Clock has increased by 56% (2475MHz vs 1590MHz)

More VRAM (12GB vs 4GB)

Larger VRAM bandwidth (504.2GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)

6272 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

GeForce GTX 1650 TU106

2.849 TFLOPS

GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER +1145%

35.48 TFLOPS

GeForce GTX 1650 TU106

VS

GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER

Graphics Card

Jun 2020

Release Date

Jan 2024

GeForce 16

Generation

GeForce 40

Desktop

Type

Desktop

PCIe 3.0 x16

Bus Interface

PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1410 MHz

Base Clock

1980 MHz

1590 MHz

Boost Clock

2475 MHz

1500 MHz

Memory Clock

1313 MHz

Memory

4GB

Memory Size

12GB

GDDR6

Memory Type

GDDR6X

128bit

Memory Bus

192bit

192.0GB/s

Bandwidth

504.2GB/s

Render Config

14

SM Count

56

-

Compute Units

-

896

Shading Units

7168

56

TMUs

224

32

ROPs

80

-

Tensor Cores

224

-

RT Cores

56

64 KB (per SM)

L1 Cache

128 KB (per SM)

1024 KB

L2 Cache

48 MB

Theoretical Performance

50.88 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

198.0 GPixel/s

89.04 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

554.4 GTexel/s

5.699 TFLOPS

FP16 (half)

35.48 TFLOPS

2.849 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

35.48 TFLOPS

89.04 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

554.4 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

TU106

GPU Name

AD104

TU106-125-KAB-A1

GPU Variant

AD104-350-A1

Turing

Architecture

Ada Lovelace

TSMC

Foundry

TSMC

12 nm

Process Size

5 nm

10.8 billion

Transistors

35.8 billion

445 mm²

Die Size

294 mm²

Board Design

90W

TDP

220W

250 W

Suggested PSU

550 W

1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a

Outputs

1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a

1x 6-pin

Power Connectors

1x 16-pin

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)

DirectX

12 Ultimate (12_2)

4.6

OpenGL

4.6

3.0

OpenCL

3.0

1.3

Vulkan

1.3

7.5

CUDA

8.9

6.6

Shader Model

6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

1

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080

2

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 vs AMD Radeon HD 8570 OEM

3

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 vs AMD Radeon R7 370

4

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 620

5

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 430

6

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100

7

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 vs ATI Radeon HD 5770 X2

8

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 vs NVIDIA GeForce 6800

9

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 vs ATI Radeon HD 4730 OEM

10

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM

Related News

1

Samsung's Own 3nm Yield is Disheartening: Galaxy S25 May Introduce MediaTek for the First Time

2

AMD Ryzen 9000 DDR5 Memory Frequency Soars: Reaches 8000MHz with All Four Slots Occupied

3

Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience

4

Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage

5

Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation

6

Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales

7

Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It

8

New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months

9

Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD

10

New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower