CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 vs ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 vs ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106
ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 and 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 2900 PRO to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1590MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
576 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (90W vs 200W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 TU106
+641%
2.849 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 2900 PRO
0.384 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 TU106
VS
Radeon HD 2900 PRO
Graphics Card
Jun 2020
Release Date
Dec 2007
GeForce 16
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1410 MHz
Base Clock
-
1590 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s
Render Config
14
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
4
896
Shading Units
320
56
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
Theoretical Performance
50.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.600 GPixel/s
89.04 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
9.600 GTexel/s
5.699 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.849 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
384.0 GFLOPS
89.04 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Graphics Processor
TU106
GPU Name
R600
TU106-125-KAB-A1
GPU Variant
R600 PRO (215RGMDKA13FG)
Turing
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
80 nm
10.8 billion
Transistors
0.72 billion
445 mm²
Die Size
420 mm²
Board Design
90W
TDP
200W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080
2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 vs AMD Radeon HD 8570 OEM
3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 vs ATI Radeon HD 4650
4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 430
5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 620
6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 vs ATI Radeon HD 5770 X2
7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 vs AMD Radeon R7 370
8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 PCIe x1
9
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460
10
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 vs NVIDIA A16 PCIe
Related News
1
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
2
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
3
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
4
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
5
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
6
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
7
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
8
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
9
Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports
10
Does the Apple A18 Neural Engine Boast Superior Performance? Computational Power May Surpass M4 Chip
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy