Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 vs ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 vs ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 and 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 2900 PRO to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1590MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
576 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (90W vs 200W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 +641%
2.849 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 2900 PRO
0.384 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2020
Release Date
Dec 2007
GeForce 16
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1410 MHz
Base Clock
-
1590 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s

Render Config

14
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
4
896
Shading Units
320
56
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB

Theoretical Performance

50.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.600 GPixel/s
89.04 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
9.600 GTexel/s
5.699 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.849 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
384.0 GFLOPS
89.04 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

TU106
GPU Name
R600
TU106-125-KAB-A1
GPU Variant
R600 PRO (215RGMDKA13FG)
Turing
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
80 nm
10.8 billion
Transistors
0.72 billion
445 mm²
Die Size
420 mm²

Board Design

90W
TDP
200W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy