Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 vs ATI Radeon X1950 GT AGP

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 vs ATI Radeon X1950 GT AGP

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 and 256MB VRAM Radeon X1950 GT AGP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1590MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 38.40GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon X1950 GT AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (57W vs 90W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2020
Release Date
Feb 2007
GeForce 16
Generation
Radeon R500 AGP
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
AGP 8x

Clock Speeds

1410 MHz
Base Clock
-
1590 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
38.40GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
14
SM Count
-
896
Shading Units
-
56
TMUs
12
32
ROPs
12
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

50.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.000 GPixel/s
89.04 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
6.000 GTexel/s
5.699 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.849 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
89.04 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

90W
TDP
57W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x Molex

Graphics Processor

TU106
GPU Name
RV570
TU106-125-KAB-A1
GPU Variant
RV570 XL
Turing
Architecture
R500
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
80 nm
10.8 billion
Transistors
0.33 billion
445 mm²
Die Size
230 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1 (full) 3.0 (partial)
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy