NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 vs Intel Arc A750
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 and 8GB VRAM Arc A750 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 's Advantages
Lower TDP (80W vs 225W)
Intel Arc A750 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 51% (2400MHz vs 1590MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
2688 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 TU116
2.849 TFLOPS
Arc A750
+503%
17.2 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2020
Release Date
Oct 2022
GeForce 16
Generation
Alchemist(Arc 7)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1410 MHz
Base Clock
2050 MHz
1590 MHz
Boost Clock
2400 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
14
SM Count
-
896
Shading Units
3584
56
TMUs
224
32
ROPs
112
-
Tensor Cores
448
-
RT Cores
28
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
50.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
268.8 GPixel/s
89.04 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
537.6 GTexel/s
5.699 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
34.41 TFLOPS
2.849 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
17.20 TFLOPS
89.04 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.150 TFLOPS
Board Design
80W
TDP
225W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
TU116
GPU Name
DG2-512
TU116-150-KA-A1
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
Turing
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
6 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.6
