Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 vs NVIDIA GeForce 210 OEM

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 vs NVIDIA GeForce 210 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce 210 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1590MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
880 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 210 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 80W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 +8040%
2.849 TFLOPS
GeForce 210 OEM
0.035 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2020
Release Date
Sep 2009
GeForce 16
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1410 MHz
Base Clock
-
1590 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

14
SM Count
2
-
Compute Units
-
896
Shading Units
16
56
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB

Theoretical Performance

50.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.900 GPixel/s
89.04 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.800 GTexel/s
5.699 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.849 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
35.20 GFLOPS
89.04 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

TU116
GPU Name
GT216
TU116-150-KA-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
0.486 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²

Board Design

80W
TDP
31W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.2
6.6
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy