CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 140 OEM
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 140 OEM
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116
NVIDIA GeForce GT 140 OEM
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 140 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1590MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 57.60GB/s)
832 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (80W vs 105W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 TU116
+1269%
2.849 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 140 OEM
0.208 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 TU116
VS
GeForce GT 140 OEM
Graphics Card
Jul 2020
Release Date
Mar 2009
GeForce 16
Generation
GeForce 100
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1410 MHz
Base Clock
-
1590 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
57.60GB/s
Render Config
14
SM Count
8
-
Compute Units
-
896
Shading Units
64
56
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
Theoretical Performance
50.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.40 GPixel/s
89.04 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.80 GTexel/s
5.699 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.849 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
208.0 GFLOPS
89.04 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Graphics Processor
TU116
GPU Name
G94B
TU116-150-KA-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
55 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
0.505 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
196 mm²
Board Design
80W
TDP
105W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
Intel Arc A580 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116
2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116
3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 vs NVIDIA T400 4 GB
4
Intel Arc A380 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116
5
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116
6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070
7
AMD Radeon 780M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116
8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2 PCIe x8
9
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT Mac Edition
10
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 vs ATI FireGL V3600
Related News
1
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
2
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
3
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
4
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
5
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
6
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
7
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
8
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
9
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
10
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy