Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 140 OEM

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 140 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 140 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1590MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 57.60GB/s)
832 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (80W vs 105W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 +1269%
2.849 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 140 OEM
0.208 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2020
Release Date
Mar 2009
GeForce 16
Generation
GeForce 100
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1410 MHz
Base Clock
-
1590 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
57.60GB/s

Render Config

14
SM Count
8
-
Compute Units
-
896
Shading Units
64
56
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB

Theoretical Performance

50.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.40 GPixel/s
89.04 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.80 GTexel/s
5.699 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.849 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
208.0 GFLOPS
89.04 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

TU116
GPU Name
G94B
TU116-150-KA-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
55 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
0.505 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
196 mm²

Board Design

80W
TDP
105W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy