NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition

VS

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 's Advantages

Released 11 years and 6 months late

Boost Clock1590MHz

More VRAM (4GB vs 1GB)

Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 159.0GB/s)

656 additional rendering cores

Lower TDP (80W vs 204W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 +302%

2.849 TFLOPS

GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition

0.708 TFLOPS

GeForce GTX 1650 TU116

VS

GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition

Graphics Card

Jul 2020

Release Date

Jan 2009

GeForce 16

Generation

GeForce 200

Desktop

Type

Desktop

PCIe 3.0 x16

Bus Interface

PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1410 MHz

Base Clock

-

1590 MHz

Boost Clock

-

1500 MHz

Memory Clock

1242 MHz

Memory

4GB

Memory Size

1024MB

GDDR6

Memory Type

GDDR3

128bit

Memory Bus

512bit

192.0GB/s

Bandwidth

159.0GB/s

Render Config

14

SM Count

30

-

Compute Units

-

896

Shading Units

240

56

TMUs

80

32

ROPs

32

-

Tensor Cores

-

RT Cores

-

64 KB (per SM)

L1 Cache

-

1024 KB

L2 Cache

256 KB

Theoretical Performance

50.88 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

20.74 GPixel/s

89.04 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

51.84 GTexel/s

5.699 TFLOPS

FP16 (half)

-

2.849 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

708.5 GFLOPS

89.04 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

88.56 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

TU116

GPU Name

GT200B

TU116-150-KA-A1

GPU Variant

G200-350-B3

Turing

Architecture

Tesla 2.0

TSMC

Foundry

TSMC

12 nm

Process Size

55 nm

6.6 billion

Transistors

1.4 billion

284 mm²

Die Size

470 mm²

Board Design

80W

TDP

204W

250 W

Suggested PSU

550 W

1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a

Outputs

2x DVI 1x S-Video

None

Power Connectors

2x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)

DirectX

11.1 (10_0)

4.6

OpenGL

3.3

3.0

OpenCL

1.1

1.3

Vulkan

N/A

7.5

CUDA

1.3

6.6

Shader Model

4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

1

Intel Arc A580 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116

2

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116

3

Intel Arc A380 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116

4

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 vs NVIDIA T400 4 GB

5

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 vs NVIDIA GeForce MX550

6

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116

7

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070

8

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB

9

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB

10

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 vs AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT

Related News

1

AMD's Latest Breakthrough Technology Could Change the Game in the Future

2

Researchers Utilize NVIDIA Omniverse Platform to Analyze and Improve 3D Stacked Chip Designs

3

TSMC to Receive Over 60 EUV Lithography Machines Over the Next Two Years, Investing More Than $12.3 Billion

4

Samsung's Own 3nm Yield is Disheartening: Galaxy S25 May Introduce MediaTek for the First Time

5

AMD Ryzen 9000 DDR5 Memory Frequency Soars: Reaches 8000MHz with All Four Slots Occupied

6

Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience

7

Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage

8

Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation

9

Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales

10

Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It