NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 vs AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 and 12GB VRAM Radeon RX 6750 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 's Advantages
Lower TDP (80W vs 250W)
AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 64% (2600MHz vs 1590MHz)
More VRAM (12GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.0GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
1664 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 TU116
2.849 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 6750 XT
+367%
13.31 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2020
Release Date
Mar 2022
GeForce 16
Generation
Navi II
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1410 MHz
Base Clock
2150 MHz
1590 MHz
Boost Clock
2600 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
432.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
40
14
SM Count
-
896
Shading Units
2560
56
TMUs
160
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
40
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
1024 KB
L2 Cache
3 MB
-
L3 Cache
96 MB
Theoretical Performance
50.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
166.4 GPixel/s
89.04 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
416.0 GTexel/s
5.699 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
26.62 TFLOPS
2.849 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.31 TFLOPS
89.04 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
832.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
80W
TDP
250W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
TU116
GPU Name
Navi 22
TU116-150-KA-A1
GPU Variant
Navi 22 KXT
(215-127000144)
Turing
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
7 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
17.2 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
335 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.5
