Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 X2

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 460 X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1590MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 115.2GB/s)
560 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (80W vs 160W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 +202%
2.849 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 460 X2
0.942 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2020
Release Date
Mar 2011
GeForce 16
Generation
GeForce 400
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1410 MHz
Base Clock
-
1590 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
115.2GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
14
SM Count
7
896
Shading Units
336
56
TMUs
56
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

50.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.814 GPixel/s
89.04 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
39.26 GTexel/s
5.699 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.849 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
941.5 GFLOPS
89.04 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
78.46 GFLOPS

Board Design

80W
TDP
160W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
3x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

TU116
GPU Name
GF104
TU116-150-KA-A1
GPU Variant
GF104-300-KB-A1
Turing
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
1.95 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
332 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
2.1
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy