Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 vs AMD FirePro S9050

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 vs AMD FirePro S9050

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 and 12GB VRAM FirePro S9050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1590MHz
Lower TDP (80W vs 225W)
AMD FirePro S9050 's Advantages
More VRAM (12GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 TU116
2.849 TFLOPS
FirePro S9050 +13%
3.226 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2020
Release Date
Aug 2014
GeForce 16
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1410 MHz
Base Clock
-
1590 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
264.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
28
14
SM Count
-
896
Shading Units
1792
56
TMUs
112
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

50.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.80 GPixel/s
89.04 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
100.8 GTexel/s
5.699 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.849 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.226 TFLOPS
89.04 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
806.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

80W
TDP
225W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

TU116
GPU Name
Tahiti
TU116-150-KA-A1
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO GL
Turing
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy