Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 vs NVIDIA GeForce2 Ultra

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 vs NVIDIA GeForce2 Ultra

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 and 64MB VRAM GeForce2 Ultra to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 's Advantages
Released 19 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1590MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 7.360GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2020
Release Date
Aug 2000
GeForce 16
Generation
GeForce 2
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
AGP 4x

Clock Speeds

1410 MHz
Base Clock
-
1590 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
230 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
64MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
7.360GB/s

Render Config

14
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
896
Shading Units
-
56
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

50.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.000 GPixel/s
89.04 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.000 GTexel/s
5.699 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.849 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
89.04 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

TU116
GPU Name
NV15
TU116-150-KA-A1
GPU Variant
GeForce2 Ultra
Turing
Architecture
Celsius
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
180 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
0.025 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
88 mm²

Board Design

80W
TDP
Unknown
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
7.0
4.6
OpenGL
1.5
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
-

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy