Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 vs ATI Radeon HD 3850 X3

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 vs ATI Radeon HD 3850 X3

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 and 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 3850 X3 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 's Advantages
Boost Clock1590MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 54.40GB/s)
576 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (80W vs 145W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 +565%
2.849 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 3850 X3
0.428 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2020
Release Date
Unknown
GeForce 16
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1410 MHz
Base Clock
-
1590 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
850 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
54.40GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
4
14
SM Count
-
896
Shading Units
320
56
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

50.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.70 GPixel/s
89.04 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.70 GTexel/s
5.699 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.849 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
428.2 GFLOPS
89.04 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

80W
TDP
145W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x DVI
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

TU116
GPU Name
RV670
TU116-150-KA-A1
GPU Variant
RV670 PRO (215-0708003)
Turing
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
55 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
0.666 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
192 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy