Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 and 1280MB VRAM GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1590MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1280GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 152.0GB/s)
448 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (80W vs 210W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 +117%
2.849 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
1.312 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2020
Release Date
Nov 2011
GeForce 16
Generation
GeForce 500
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1410 MHz
Base Clock
-
1590 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
950 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1280MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
320bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
152.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
14
SM Count
14
896
Shading Units
448
56
TMUs
56
32
ROPs
40
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
640 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

50.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.50 GPixel/s
89.04 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
40.99 GTexel/s
5.699 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.849 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1312 GFLOPS
89.04 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
164.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

80W
TDP
210W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

TU116
GPU Name
GF110
TU116-150-KA-A1
GPU Variant
GF110-270-A1
Turing
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
3 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
2.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy