Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 vs AMD Radeon R9 295X2

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 vs AMD Radeon R9 295X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 295X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1590MHz
Lower TDP (80W vs 500W)
AMD Radeon R9 295X2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
1920 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 TU116
2.849 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 295X2 +101%
5.733 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2020
Release Date
Apr 2014
GeForce 16
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1410 MHz
Base Clock
-
1590 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
512bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
44
14
SM Count
-
896
Shading Units
2816
56
TMUs
176
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

50.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
65.15 GPixel/s
89.04 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
179.2 GTexel/s
5.699 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.849 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.733 TFLOPS
89.04 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
716.7 GFLOPS

Board Design

80W
TDP
500W
250 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

TU116
GPU Name
Vesuvius
TU116-150-KA-A1
GPU Variant
Vesuvius XT (215-0852022)
Turing
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy