NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs Intel Arc Pro A60
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 and 12GB VRAM Arc Pro A60 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 130W)
Intel Arc Pro A60 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 23% (2050MHz vs 1665MHz)
More VRAM (12GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (384.0GB/s vs 128.1GB/s)
1152 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650
2.984 TFLOPS
Arc Pro A60
+181%
8.397 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce GTX 1650
3566
Arc Pro A60
+107%
7385
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
GeForce GTX 1650
1606
Arc Pro A60
+125%
3623
Graphics Card
Apr 2019
Release Date
Jun 2023
GeForce 16
Generation
Alchemist
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1485 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
1665 MHz
Boost Clock
2050 MHz
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
384.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
14
SM Count
-
896
Shading Units
2048
56
TMUs
128
32
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
256
-
RT Cores
16
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
53.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
131.2 GPixel/s
93.24 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
262.4 GTexel/s
5.967 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
16.79 TFLOPS
2.984 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.397 TFLOPS
93.24 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
75W
TDP
130W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 2.0
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
DG2-256
TU117-300-A1
GPU Variant
ACM-G12
Turing
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
6 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
11.5 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
269 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.6
