Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs AMD Radeon RX 5300

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs AMD Radeon RX 5300

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 and 3GB VRAM Radeon RX 5300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 1% (1665MHz vs 1645MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 3GB)
Lower TDP (75W vs 100W)
AMD Radeon RX 5300 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 1 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (168.0GB/s vs 128.1GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650
2.984 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 5300 +55%
4.632 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2019
Release Date
May 2020
GeForce 16
Generation
Navi
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1485 MHz
Base Clock
1327 MHz
1665 MHz
Boost Clock
1645 MHz
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
96bit
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
168.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
22
14
SM Count
-
896
Shading Units
1408
56
TMUs
88
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

53.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
52.64 GPixel/s
93.24 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
144.8 GTexel/s
5.967 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
9.265 TFLOPS
2.984 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.632 TFLOPS
93.24 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
289.5 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
100W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
Navi 14
TU117-300-A1
GPU Variant
Navi 14 XE
Turing
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
7 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
6.4 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
158 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy