NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs ATI FirePro V3900
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V3900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1665MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.1GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
416 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V3900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650
+378%
2.984 TFLOPS
FirePro V3900
0.624 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2019
Release Date
Feb 2012
GeForce 16
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1485 MHz
Base Clock
-
1665 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
6
14
SM Count
-
896
Shading Units
480
56
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
53.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.200 GPixel/s
93.24 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.60 GTexel/s
5.967 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.984 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
624.0 GFLOPS
93.24 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
75W
TDP
50W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort 1.1
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
Turks
TU117-300-A1
GPU Variant
Turks GL
Turing
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
0.716 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.0
