Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs ATI FirePro V8700 Duo

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs ATI FirePro V8700 Duo

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V8700 Duo to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 's Advantages
Boost Clock1665MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.1GB/s vs 108.8GB/s)
96 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 151W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 +148%
2.984 TFLOPS
FirePro V8700 Duo
1.2 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2019
Release Date
Unknown
GeForce 16
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1485 MHz
Base Clock
-
1665 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
850 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
108.8GB/s

Render Config

14
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
10
896
Shading Units
800
56
TMUs
40
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

53.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
93.24 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.00 GTexel/s
5.967 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.984 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1200 GFLOPS
93.24 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
RV770
TU117-300-A1
GPU Variant
RV770 XT (215-0669049)
Turing
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
55 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
151W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy