CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce 210
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce 210
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
NVIDIA GeForce 210
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 and 512MB VRAM GeForce 210 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1665MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.1GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
880 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 210 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650
+7551%
2.984 TFLOPS
GeForce 210
0.039 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650
VS
GeForce 210
Graphics Card
Apr 2019
Release Date
Oct 2009
GeForce 16
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1485 MHz
Base Clock
-
1665 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s
Render Config
14
SM Count
2
-
Compute Units
-
896
Shading Units
16
56
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
Theoretical Performance
53.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.080 GPixel/s
93.24 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.160 GTexel/s
5.967 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.984 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
39.36 GFLOPS
93.24 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
GT218
TU117-300-A1
GPU Variant
GT218-300-A2
Turing
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²
Board Design
75W
TDP
31W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.2
6.6
Shader Model
4.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB
2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB
4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970
5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060
6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA T400
8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 640
9
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation
10
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs ATI Radeon HD 3850
Related News
1
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
2
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
3
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
4
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
5
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
6
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
7
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
8
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
9
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
10
Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy