CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 2
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 and 512MB VRAM GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1665MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.1GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
888 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650
+13463%
2.984 TFLOPS
GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 2
0.022 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650
VS
GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 2
Graphics Card
Apr 2019
Release Date
Dec 2007
GeForce 16
Generation
GeForce 8
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1485 MHz
Base Clock
-
1665 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s
Render Config
14
SM Count
1
-
Compute Units
-
896
Shading Units
8
56
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
16 KB
Theoretical Performance
53.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.268 GPixel/s
93.24 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.268 GTexel/s
5.967 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.984 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
22.40 GFLOPS
93.24 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
G98
TU117-300-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
65 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
86 mm²
Board Design
75W
TDP
25W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB
2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB
3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060
4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970
5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA T400
6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA T1000
7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs AMD FirePro W5000 DVI
9
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs AMD Radeon R7 250E
10
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 v2 ES
Related News
1
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
2
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
3
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
4
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
5
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
6
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
7
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
8
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
9
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
10
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy