Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA P106 090

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA P106 090

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 and 3GB VRAM P106 090 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 9% (1665MHz vs 1531MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 3GB)
128 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA P106 090 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.2GB/s vs 128.1GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 +26%
2.984 TFLOPS
P106 090
2.352 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2019
Release Date
Jul 2017
GeForce 16
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1485 MHz
Base Clock
1354 MHz
1665 MHz
Boost Clock
1531 MHz
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
2002 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
192.2GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
14
SM Count
6
896
Shading Units
768
56
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

53.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
73.49 GPixel/s
93.24 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
73.49 GTexel/s
5.967 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
36.74 GFLOPS
2.984 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.352 TFLOPS
93.24 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
73.49 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
75W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
GP106
TU117-300-A1
GPU Variant
GP106-090-A1
Turing
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
16 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
4.4 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
6.1
6.6
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy