CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs ATI Radeon HD 4700
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs ATI Radeon HD 4700
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
ATI Radeon HD 4700
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 and 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 4700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1665MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.1GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
576 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 4700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650
+677%
2.984 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 4700
0.384 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650
VS
Radeon HD 4700
Graphics Card
Apr 2019
Release Date
Feb 2010
GeForce 16
Generation
Radeon R700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1485 MHz
Base Clock
-
1665 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s
Render Config
14
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
4
896
Shading Units
320
56
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
Theoretical Performance
53.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.800 GPixel/s
93.24 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.20 GTexel/s
5.967 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.984 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
384.0 GFLOPS
93.24 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
RV730
TU117-300-A1
GPU Variant
RV730 CE
Turing
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
55 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
0.514 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
146 mm²
Board Design
75W
TDP
50W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
4.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB
2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB
3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060
4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA T400
5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970
6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA T1000
7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs ATI Radeon HD 5870 Mac Edition
9
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs ATI Radeon HD 3450
10
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce G100 OEM
Related News
1
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
2
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
3
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
4
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
5
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
6
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
7
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
8
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
9
Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports
10
Does the Apple A18 Neural Engine Boast Superior Performance? Computational Power May Surpass M4 Chip
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy