Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 4100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 39% (1665MHz vs 1201MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.1GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 's Advantages
128 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 +21%
2.984 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro WX 4100
2.46 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2019
Release Date
Nov 2016
GeForce 16
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1485 MHz
Base Clock
1125 MHz
1665 MHz
Boost Clock
1201 MHz
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
16
14
SM Count
-
896
Shading Units
1024
56
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

53.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.22 GPixel/s
93.24 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
76.86 GTexel/s
5.967 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
2.460 TFLOPS
2.984 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.460 TFLOPS
93.24 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
153.7 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
50W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
Baffin
TU117-300-A1
GPU Variant
Baffin XT
Turing
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
12 nm
Process Size
14 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
3 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy