Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs AMD Radeon R7 240

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs AMD Radeon R7 240

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 240 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 113% (1665MHz vs 780MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.1GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
576 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R7 240 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 +497%
2.984 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 240
0.499 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2019
Release Date
Oct 2013
GeForce 16
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1485 MHz
Base Clock
730 MHz
1665 MHz
Boost Clock
780 MHz
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
5
14
SM Count
-
896
Shading Units
320
56
TMUs
20
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

53.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.240 GPixel/s
93.24 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.60 GTexel/s
5.967 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.984 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
499.2 GFLOPS
93.24 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

75W
TDP
30W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
Oland
TU117-300-A1
GPU Variant
Oland PRO (215-0837015)
Turing
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy