NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs AMD Radeon R9 285X
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 and 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 285X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 's Advantages
Boost Clock1665MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 3GB)
Lower TDP (75W vs 200W)
AMD Radeon R9 285X 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 128.1GB/s)
1152 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650
2.984 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 285X
+37%
4.104 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2019
Release Date
Unknown
GeForce 16
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1485 MHz
Base Clock
-
1665 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
264.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
32
14
SM Count
-
896
Shading Units
2048
56
TMUs
128
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
53.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
32.06 GPixel/s
93.24 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
128.3 GTexel/s
5.967 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.984 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.104 TFLOPS
93.24 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
75W
TDP
200W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
Tonga
TU117-300-A1
GPU Variant
Tonga XT
(215-0851313)
Turing
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
5 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.3
