NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs Intel Arc A350
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER and 4GB VRAM Arc A350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.0GB/s vs 124.0GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores
Intel Arc A350 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 12% (2000MHz vs 1785MHz)
Lower TDP (25W vs 125W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
+63%
5.027 TFLOPS
Arc A350
3.072 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
+86%
6048
Arc A350
3239
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
+88%
2792
Arc A350
1481
Graphics Card
Oct 2019
Release Date
Jan 2022
GeForce 16
Generation
Alchemist(Arc 3)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
1530 MHz
Base Clock
2000 MHz
1785 MHz
Boost Clock
2000 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
192bit
Memory Bus
64bit
336.0GB/s
Bandwidth
124.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
22
SM Count
-
1408
Shading Units
768
88
TMUs
48
48
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
6
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1536 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
85.68 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
48.00 GPixel/s
157.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
96.00 GTexel/s
10.05 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
6.144 TFLOPS
5.027 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.072 TFLOPS
157.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
768.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
125W
TDP
25W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
TU116
GPU Name
DG2-128
TU116-300-A1
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Turing
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
6 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.6
