CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs AMD FirePro W9000
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs AMD FirePro W9000
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
AMD FirePro W9000
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER and 6GB VRAM FirePro W9000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1785MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.0GB/s vs 264.0GB/s)
Lower TDP (125W vs 274W)
AMD FirePro W9000 's Advantages
640 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
+25%
5.027 TFLOPS
FirePro W9000
3.994 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
VS
FirePro W9000
Graphics Card
Oct 2019
Release Date
Jun 2012
GeForce 16
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1530 MHz
Base Clock
-
1785 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
384bit
336.0GB/s
Bandwidth
264.0GB/s
Render Config
22
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
32
1408
Shading Units
2048
88
TMUs
128
48
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
Theoretical Performance
85.68 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
31.20 GPixel/s
157.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
124.8 GTexel/s
10.05 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.027 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.994 TFLOPS
157.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
998.4 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
TU116
GPU Name
Tahiti
TU116-300-A1
GPU Variant
Tahiti XT GL
Turing
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²
Board Design
125W
TDP
274W
300 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs AMD Radeon RX 6600
4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070
5
AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB
8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs AMD Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 2
9
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs ATI FireGL V5600
10
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100
Related News
1
AMD Ryzen 9000 DDR5 Memory Frequency Soars: Reaches 8000MHz with All Four Slots Occupied
2
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
3
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
4
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
5
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
6
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
7
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
8
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
9
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
10
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy