Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER and 16GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER 's Advantages
Lower TDP (125W vs 320W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 43% (2550MHz vs 1785MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (736.3GB/s vs 336.0GB/s)
8832 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
5.027 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER +938%
52.22 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
5987
GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER +373%
28371
Blender
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
880
GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER +949%
9232
OctaneBench
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
127
GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER +659%
964
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2160p
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
26
GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER +430%
138
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1440p
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
52
GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER +388%
254
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1080p
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
79
GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER +279%
300
Battlefield 5 2160p
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
41
GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER +285%
158
Battlefield 5 1440p
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
78
GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER +156%
200
Battlefield 5 1080p
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
97
GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER +106%
200
GTA 5 2160p
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
60
GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER +180%
168
GTA 5 1440p
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
76
GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER +136%
180
GTA 5 1080p
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
178
GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER +6%
190
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2019
Release Date
Jan 2024
GeForce 16
Generation
GeForce 40
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1530 MHz
Base Clock
2295 MHz
1785 MHz
Boost Clock
2550 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1438 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6X
192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
336.0GB/s
Bandwidth
736.3GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
22
SM Count
80
1408
Shading Units
10240
88
TMUs
320
48
ROPs
112
-
Tensor Cores
320
-
RT Cores
80
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
64 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

85.68 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
285.6 GPixel/s
157.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
816.0 GTexel/s
10.05 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
52.22 TFLOPS
5.027 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
52.22 TFLOPS
157.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
816.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

125W
TDP
320W
300 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin

Graphics Processor

TU116
GPU Name
AD103
TU116-300-A1
GPU Variant
AD103-400-A1
Turing
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
5 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
45.9 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
379 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
8.9
6.6
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy