CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q vs NVIDIA GeForce 720M
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q vs NVIDIA GeForce 720M
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q
NVIDIA GeForce 720M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q and 2GB VRAM GeForce 720M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
Released 6 years late
Boost Clock1335MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
1440 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q
+1608%
4.101 TFLOPS
GeForce 720M
0.24 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q
VS
GeForce 720M
Graphics Card
Apr 2019
Release Date
Apr 2013
GeForce 16 Mobile
Generation
GeForce 700M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1140 MHz
Base Clock
-
1335 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
192bit
Memory Bus
64bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s
Render Config
24
SM Count
2
-
Compute Units
-
1536
Shading Units
96
96
TMUs
16
48
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
Theoretical Performance
64.08 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.500 GPixel/s
128.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.00 GTexel/s
8.202 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.101 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
240.0 GFLOPS
128.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
20.00 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
TU116
GPU Name
GF117
-
GPU Variant
N14M-GE
Turing
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
0.585 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
116 mm²
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
33W
-
Suggested PSU
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
2.1
6.7
Shader Model
5.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
AMD Radeon R9 M365X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q
2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
3
AMD Radeon 780M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q
4
NVIDIA GeForce MX450 30.5W 10Gbps vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q
5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q
6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q
7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q vs AMD Radeon R5 A220
8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 360M
9
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q vs AMD Radeon HD 6990M
10
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max Q
Related News
1
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
2
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
3
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
4
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
5
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
6
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
7
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
8
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
9
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
10
Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy